The Stated Goal: The bill aims to hold tech platforms accountable for protecting minors online by enforcing a "duty of care."

The Reality / Concern: Critics (including civil liberties, digital rights, and LGBTQ+ organizations) point out that the bill gives government officials—like state Attorneys General—broad power to penalize platforms over content deemed "inappropriate" for minors. This functions as a backdoor for widespread censorship, potentially restricting access to resources on reproductive health, LGBTQ+ topics, and mental health. 

Compelled Age Verification: To comply with the law, platforms might be forced to implement strict age-verification systems, destroying anonymous browsing and collecting sensitive data from both adults and minors. 

Risk of Censorship: Vague definitions of "harmful" content mean platforms will likely over-censor completely benign discussions to avoid legal liability. 

Loss of Privacy: To prove who is an adult or a minor, sites would have to collect ID documents or track users aggressively, putting user data at risk. 

Marginalized Communities at Risk: Young people looking for support networks, LGBTQ+ resources, or mental health info outside of traditional channels may find themselves blocked from accessing life-saving information. 

Visit stopkosa.com

Call or write to congress.

Spread the Word.